Understanding Multi-Touch Attribution Solutions: The Methods, Models and Tools You Need

Customers rarely convert after a single interaction. They research, compare, and engage with your brand across multiple channels before making a decision.  This is where multi-touch attribution (MTA) becomes essential.

Instead of relying on outdated models that only credit a single interaction, MTA gives you a holistic view of the customer journey. It reveals how each touchpoint – from your initial ad to the final email – contributes to conversions.

Below, we'll break down exactly what multi-touch attribution is, the different models, methods for implementation, and the solutions you can leverage.

What is Multi-Touch Attribution?

Multi-Touch Attribution (MTA) is a marketing measurement strategy that evaluates the impact of every customer interaction or touchpoint in the buyer’s journey. 

It assigns proportional credit to each touchpoint based on its influence in driving a specific desired action, such as a purchase or a sign-up. 

The aim here is to help marketing teams get a better understanding of how different marketing efforts contribute to conversions. 

What’s the Difference Between Last-Touch Attribution vs. Multi-Touch Attribution?

💡The main difference between last-touch attribution and multi-touch attribution lies in how they assign credit for a conversion. 

Last-touch attribution is a model that assigns 100% of the credit for a conversion to the final interaction or touchpoint that occurred before the customer took a desired action. 

This method assumes that the last touchpoint is solely responsible for the conversion, disregarding previous interactions in the buyer’s journey. 

Let’s say a customer first discovers a brand through a Google ad, later reads a blog post on the brand’s website, and finally makes a purchase after clicking an email promotion. 

In a last-touch attribution model, only the email promotion receives 100% credit for the sale, ignoring the earlier touchpoints that contributed. 

Meanwhile, multi-touch attribution assigns credit to multiple touchpoints involved in the customer’s journey based on their influence. 

Different models, such as linear, time-decay, or position-based, distribute credit proportionally to touchpoints.

Using the same customer journey: Google ad → Blog post → Email promotion → Purchase. 

In a multi-touch attribution model, the Google ad might receive 30% of the credit, the blog post 20%, and the email promotion 50%, reflecting their respective roles in influencing the purchase. 

What’s the Difference Between First-Touch Attribution vs. Multi-Touch Attribution?

💡Again, the core difference between first-touch attribution and multi-touch attribution is how they assign credit for a conversion. 

First-touch attribution assigns 100% of the credit for a conversion to the very first interaction a customer has with a brand. 

It assumes that the initial touchpoint is the most critical driver of the conversion, regardless of subsequent interactions. 

For example, a potential customer first learns about a brand through a podcast sponsorship. After hearing the podcast, they visit the brand’s website but don’t purchase immediately. 

Days later, they click on a Facebook ad and ultimately make a purchase after receiving a promotional email. In a first-touch attribution model, the podcast sponsorship gets full credit for the sale, even though follow-up interactions were instrumental.

But in a multi-touch attribution model, the system assigns credit to all relevant touchpoints involved in the customer’s journey based on their influence. 

Using the same customer journey: Podcast sponsorship → Facebook ad → Promotional email → Purchase. 

In a multi-touch attribution model, the podcast sponsorship might receive 40% of the credit, the Facebook ad 25%, and the promotional email 35%, recognizing the impact of all touchpoints. 

Understanding Multi-Touch Attribution Models

With a solid understanding of multi-touch attribution and the steps involved in implementation, it's time to explore the core of it all: different attribution models.

These models dictate how credit is assigned to each touchpoint in the customer journey. Choosing the right model is crucial for gaining accurate insights and optimizing your marketing strategy.

Linear Attribution Model

The linear attribution model assigns equal credit to all touchpoints involved in a customer’s journey, from the first interaction to the final conversion. 

So if a customer interacts with five different marketing channels before making a purchase, each channel receives 20% of the credit (100% divided equally among the five touchpoints). 

This approach ensures that every interaction contributing to the conversion is acknowledged.

💡Example:

A customer first clicks on a Google search ad, visits a product page via organic search, reads a review on a third-party site, engages with a social media ad, and finally purchases after receiving a promotional email. 

In a linear attribution model, each of these five touchpoints receives 20% of the credit for the sale.

Pros:

• Simple and fair. Easy to understand and implement.

• Comprehensive. Takes into account every marketing effort that contributed to the conversion.

• Balanced perspective. Useful when no single touchpoint dominates the customer journey.

Cons:

• Lacks precision. Doesn’t account for the varying impact of different touchpoints.

• Equal weight issue. May undervalue critical touchpoints that played a more significant role in conversion. 

• Limited insight. Can obscure which channels are driving the most valuable interactions.

Time-Decay Model 

The time-decay attribution model gives more credit to touchpoints that occur closer to the time of conversion. 

The idea is that, as ‘time progresses’, the value of older touchpoints decays, leaving the most recent interactions getting the highest credit. 

This model is useful for businesses where customer decisions are heavily influenced by their latest interactions.

💡Example:

Imagine this scenario: A lead first interacts with a brand through a webinar three months before purchase, then downloads a whitepaper two months later, clicks a targeted LinkedIn ad three weeks before purchase, and finally responds to a direct email offer a week before buying. 

In a time-decay attribution model, the email offer might receive 50% of the credit, the LinkedIn ad 30%, the whitepaper 15%, and the webinar only 5%. 

Pros:

• Real-time relevance. Reflects the importance of recent interactions.

• Logical weighting. Acknowledges that the closer the touchpoint is to conversion, the greater its influence.

• Campaign optimization. Helps businesses optimize last-mile marketing efforts. 

Cons:

• Overlooks early efforts. Discounts earlier touchpoints that may have initiated customer interest.

• Complex implementation. Requires advanced tracking and time-sensitive data attribution. 

• Limited for long sales cycles. May not be suitable for industries with extended purchase timelines.

U-Shaped Attribution Model

The U-shaped (also called position-based) attribution model assigns the most credit to the first and last touchpoints of the customer journey, with the remaining credit distributed evenly among the intermediate touchpoints. 

This model reflects the belief that the initial interaction generates awareness, while the final touchpoint drives conversion.

💡Example:

A customer first discovers a brand through a YouTube ad, later engages with a blog post, downloads a product brochure, and finally makes a purchase after receiving a personalized email offer. 

In a U-shaped attribution model, the YouTube ad and personalized email would each receive 40% of the credit, while the blog post and brochure download would share the remaining 20% equally. 

Pros:

• Balanced view. Recognizes the importance of both introduction and closing interactions.

• Reflects real-world journeys. Ideal for businesses where brand discovery and final offers are critical drivers.

• Customizable. The credit distribution can be adjusted to fit specific business models.

Cons:

• Assumptions may not hold. Not all first and last touchpoints are equally influential.

• Limited insight into middle stages. May underrepresent the impact of critical mid-funnel interactions. 

• Requires accurate tracking. Incomplete data can distort the results.

W-Shaped Attribution Model

The W-shaped attribution model assigns the most credit to the first, middle, and last touchpoints in the customer journey. 

In this case, that’ll be 30% of the credit to the first touchpoint, 30% to the last touchpoint, and 30% to the most significant mid-funnel interaction. The remaining 10% is divided equally among other touchpoints in the journey. 

💡Example:

A customer first encounters a brand through a paid LinkedIn ad (first touchpoint). 

They later attend a product webinar (mid-funnel interaction) and, after receiving a personalized sales call (final touchpoint), make a purchase. 

In a W-shaped attribution model, the LinkedIn ad, product webinar, and sales call would each receive 30% of the credit, while any other supporting touchpoints like blog visits or email newsletters would share the remaining 10%. 

Pros:

• Comprehensive insight. Balances the significance of major touchpoints throughout the journey.

• Effective for B2B sales. Suitable for complex buying processes with multiple key interactions.

• Strategic focus. Helps identify high-impact mid-funnel touchpoints often overlooked by other models. 

Cons:

• Complex to set up. Requires detailed tracking and advanced attribution tools.
• Less effective for simple journeys. May not be suitable for straightforward eCommerce sales with minimal touchpoints. 

• Data dependency. Requires robust and accurate data collection to be effective.

Custom Multi-Touch Attribution Model

The custom multi-touch attribution model is a tailored approach where businesses define how much credit is assigned to each touchpoint based on their unique customer journey and marketing goals. 

This model leverages business-specific rules, algorithms, or AI-based learning systems to attribute value based on real-time data. 

💡Example:

A SaaS company might create a custom attribution model that assigns 50% credit to the first demo request, 30% to attending a webinar, and 20% to engaging with a follow-up email campaign. 

These weights reflect the company’s data showing that demos and webinars are key sales drivers. 

Pros:

• Highly relevant. Tailored specifically to the business’s unique sales process.

• Data-driven decisions. Uses historical and real-time data to refine attribution rules. 

• Scalable. Can adapt to changing customer behaviors and new marketing channels. 

Cons:

• Complex setup. Requires deep data analysis and advanced attribution tools.

• Resource-intensive. Needs continuous monitoring and adjustment.

• Data quality dependency. Relies on high-quality, integrated data for accuracy.

PRO TIP 💡: HockeyStack's multi-touch attribution solution integrates self-reported attribution with tracked touchpoints to provide a comprehensive view of the buyer journey. This way, your teams can accurately assess the impact of each marketing activity on the bottom line.

‍

How to Implement Multi-Touch Attribution Solutions? 8 Key Steps

Implementing multi-touch attribution requires a strategic approach. It's about more than just choosing a model – you need to define clear objectives, gather the right data, and leverage the insights to optimize your campaigns.

Here's an 8-step guide to successfully implement multi-touch attribution:

‍Set Clear Attribution Objective

Before implementing multi-touch attribution, you need to establish clear, measurable goals that align with your business strategy. 

Start by defining specific objectives:

• Short-term goals might focus on optimizing marketing spend and improving campaign performance
• Long-term goals could include understanding customer behavior patterns and increasing overall marketing ROI

Next, establish concrete KPIs (e.g.,CPA, CLV, ROAS, etc)  to measure success. 

Furthermore, the key to successful implementation is ensuring alignment across departments. Work with marketing, sales, and finance teams to validate your objectives and get organizational buy-in early in the process. 

This collaboration helps ensure your attribution goals support broader business objectives while providing actionable insights for all stakeholders. 

💡Pro Tip → Start with 2-3 primary KPIs rather than tracking everything at once. For example, focus initially on conversion rates and ROAS. Once you’ve mastered tracking and optimizing these, gradually expand your attribution metrics. 

Map the Complete Customer Journey

Identify all touchpoints where customers engage with your brand, from initial discovery to final conversion. This might include: 

• First Touch. How do customers initially discover your brand? (e.g., organic search, social media, paid ads, referrals). 

• Mid-Journey Touchpoints. How do customers engage with your brand after initial discovery? (e.g., website visits, content downloads, email interactions, social media engagement). 

• Last Touch. What is the final touchpoint that leads to conversion? (e.g., clicking a specific ad, visiting a product page, signing up for a trial). 

Each stage should be tracked as a micro-conversion, allowing you to understand how different interactions contribute to the final conversion. 

PRO TIP 💡: HockeyStack's Buyer Journeys feature simplifies tracking engagement across multiple touchpoints. You can unify data from various channels and accounts, to get a single, accurate view of the customer journey.

‍

Choose the Right Attribution Model and Tool

Evaluate different attribution models like linear, time-decay, U-shaped, W-shaped, or custom models based on your sales cycle, customer journey complexity, campaign goals and overall marketing performance. 

For example, if you have a long sales cycle with many touchpoints, a time decay model might be suitable to emphasize interactions closer to the conversion. 

Meanwhile, if you want to emphasize the first and last touchpoints while distributing credit across the middle, a U-shaped or W-shaped model might be a better fit. 

Once you’ve chosen a model, look for attribution software that supports it. Here are a few examples: 

• HockeyStack. Offers flexibility with various models, including first-touch, last-touch, linear, time decay, U-shaped, and W-shaped, as well as custom models. This allows you to align your attribution strategy with your specific needs and analyze data accordingly.

• Ruler Analytics. Provides strong support for time decay attribution, making it ideal for businesses that want to prioritize touchpoints closer to conversion. 

• HubSpot Marketing Hub. While offering various models, HubSpot leans towards a full-funnel approach, often utilizing a W-shaped model to give credit to key touchpoints throughout the customer journey.

• Google Analytics. Provides basic attribution models like first-touch, last-touch, linear, time decay, and position-based, making it a good starting point for businesses exploring attribution. 

When selecting your tool, consider factors like:

• Integration capabilities with your existing tech stack
• Reporting flexibility and customization options
• Price point relative to your marketing budget
• Level of technical expertise required

💡Pro Tip → Before committing to a specific attribution model, run a pilot program using two different models simultaneously for 30 days. 

Compare the insights generated and assess which model provides more actionable data for your specific business needs. 

This approach helps validate your choice before full implementation.

Collect and Centralize Data 

Data Collection

Ensure your tracking system captures data from all relevant touchpoints across various channels and devices. 

You can use cookies, user logins, and session-based identifiers to track individual users across multiple sessions, ensuring a complete view of their journey.

Data Centralization

Store collected data in a centralized repository such as a data warehouse (e.g., Google BigQuery, Snowflake) or a customer data platform (CDP). 

Use a CRM or marketing automation platform to organize and manage customer data alongside attribution data.

To do this: 

• Create structured and unstructured data repositories. 
• Use extract, transform, load (ETL) processes to clean and normalize data. 
• Build unified customer profiles by merging data from multiple systems. 

💡Pro Tip → Document all your tracking parameters, conversion events, and customer identifiers. This reference guide ensures consistency across teams and makes it easier to troubleshoot tracking issues when they arise. 

Also, schedule monthly data audits to maintain data integrity and catch any tracking gaps early.

Integrate Data Sources

Ensure seamless data flow by integrating marketing automation platforms (e.g., Marketo, HubSpot), CRM systems (e.g., Salesforce), and analytics tools. Why? A centralized data ecosystem ensures consistent tracking, unified reporting, and actionable insights. 

For example, you can integrate your CRM with your analytics platform to connect website activity with customer data. Also, you can use hidden form fields to capture lead source information and pass it to your CRM for detailed attribution tracking (next up).

Here’s how to do this: 

• Connect your tools using APIs, middleware, or data integration platforms to streamline data transfer. 
• Ensure uniform data formats, campaign naming conventions, and tracking IDs across platforms to avoid data duplication and inconsistencies. 
• Sync CRM records with customer touchpoints for a 360-degree view of the customer journey. 

Implement Attribution Tracking

• Install the necessary tracking code (e.g., JavaScript snippet) on your website to capture user interactions such as page views, clicks, form submissions, and scroll depth. 
• Ensure your tracking code supports UTM parameters from your marketing campaigns to identify the source, medium, and campaign of your traffic. 
• Deploy event tracking for key actions like downloads and form submissions. 

💡Pro Tip → Create a “pre-launch checklist” for new campaigns that includes UTM parameter verification and tracking code testing. 

Analyze and Visualize Data

• Use reporting and visualization tools to explore attribution data and identify trends. some text (Build custom dashboards to track essential metrics and highlight the performance of different touchpoints.) 

• Link marketing data with revenue data to evaluate the ROI of your campaigns.

• Visualize user journeys to understand how customers interact with your brand across different touchpoints. Identify bottlenecks and key drop-off points to optimize the journey. 

💡Pro Tip → Use interactive dashboards with drill-down features that allow you to filter attribution data by campaign, customer segment, and revenue impact. Schedule monthly reviews with marketing and finance teams to assess performance trends. 

Apply Insights and Optimize

• Use attribution data to determine which touchpoints drive the highest conversions and customer lifetime value. Focus on high-impact interactions, such as landing pages with high engagement or marketing emails with strong open rates.

• Reallocate budgets toward high-performing channels based on data-driven insights. Use campaign-level ROI metrics to justify increased investment in successful marketing strategies.
• Leverage attribution data to personalize messaging, optimize landing pages, and enhance user experience at each stage of the customer journey. 

💡Pro Tip → Build predictive models using attribution data to forecast marketing outcomes and adjust campaign budgets dynamically. This approach allows continuous optimization based on real-time performance insights. 

Top 6 Multi-Touch Attribution Tools and Solutions to Consider

Now that you understand the power of multi-touch attribution and how to implement it, let's explore the tools that can bring your strategy to life.

The right MTA solution can make all the difference in accurately tracking your customer journey, analyzing data, and optimizing your campaigns.

Here are 6 leading multi-touch attribution tools to consider:

1. HockeyStack

HockeyStack specializes in providing comprehensive multi-touch attribution for B2B SaaS companies. It offers a data-driven approach that centralizes marketing, product, and revenue data into a single source of truth. 

Its main focus is enabling businesses to understand and optimize every customer touchpoint across the entire customer journey.

Strengths:

• Granular Attribution Models. Supports first-touch, last-touch, linear, time decay, and custom attribution models.

• Revenue Reporting. Ties revenue data directly to marketing efforts, ensuring ROI visibility.

• Cross-Platform Tracking. Tracks users across different channels, including paid ads, organic search, email marketing, and more.

• Integration Capabilities. Seamlessly integrates with major CRM and marketing platforms such as HubSpot, Salesforce, and Google Ads.

• Real-Time Insights. Delivers real-time analytics for faster decision-making.

• Customization. Provides custom dashboard creation and tailored reporting options. 

💡Best for → Businesses seeking an all-in-one solution to track, analyze, and optimize their marketing efforts with a focus on revenue attribution. 

Particularly strong for B2B SaaS businesses that want to understand the full customer journey and demonstrate the impact of marketing on revenue.

2. Ruler Analytics

Ruler Analytics excels in marketing attribution and closed-loop reporting, connecting marketing activities to real revenue. 

Its primary focus is on bridging the gap between marketing and sales by linking CRM and analytics data.

Strengths: 

• Call Tracking Integration. Tracks calls and matches them to marketing touchpoints.
• Lead Source Visibility. Provides clear insights into which campaigns generate the most valuable leads.
• Revenue-Focused Reports. Delivers detailed revenue attribution reports to measure ROI accurately. 

💡Best for → Businesses looking for end-to-end marketing attribution that links online and offline marketing efforts with revenue data. 

3. HubSpot Marketing Hub

HubSpot’s Marketing Hub provides comprehensive marketing attribution alongside its all-in-one marketing automation platform. 

It does this by connecting marketing efforts with sales outcomes through its native CRM integration. 

Strengths: 

• Content Management. Includes blogging, email marketing, and landing page creation.
• Automation & Personalization. Enables automated workflows and personalized customer experiences. 
• Multi-Model Flexibility. Offers first-touch, last-touch, linear, and custom attribution models. 

💡Best for → Companies wanting an integrated marketing automation platform with built-in attribution capabilities, especially those already using HubSpot’s CRM system. 

4. Adobe Analytics

Adobe Analytics delivers enterprise-level attribution capabilities within its comprehensive analytics suite. It helps in handling complex, multi-channel customer journeys and provide in-depth insights into user behavior.

Strengths: 

• Cross-Device Tracking. Tracks customer journeys across multiple devices and channels. 
• Custom Variables. Allows extensive customization of tracking parameters and metrics. 
• Predictive Analytics. Uses AI to forecast trends and suggest optimization opportunities. 

💡Best for → Enterprise organizations requiring advanced attribution modeling and handling large volumes of cross-channel customer data. 

5. Google Analytics

Google Analytics, particularly GA4, provides detailed insights into website and marketing campaign performance. Its primary focus is tracking and reporting website traffic and user behavior across various channels. 

Strengths: 

• Universal Integration. Works seamlessly with Google Ads and other Google marketing tools. 
• Easy Implementation. Simple setup with standard tracking code installation. 
• Advanced Segmentation. Provides segmentation by demographics, devices, and user behavior. 

💡Best for → Small to medium-sized businesses looking for a free, reliable attribution solution, especially those heavily invested in Google’s marketing ecosystem.

6. Bizible

Bizible, now Adobe’s Marketo Measure, specializes in B2B marketing attribution. It tracks complex, longer sales cycles and connects marketing touchpoints to pipeline and revenue generation. 

Strengths: 

• Data Customization. Allows in-depth report customization based on specific business goals.
• Offline Tracking. Captures both online and offline marketing touchpoints. 
• CRM Integration. Works natively with Salesforce for seamless marketing and sales data synchronization. 

💡Best for → B2B marketers using Salesforce who need granular attribution data to link marketing campaigns directly to pipeline and revenue growth. 

Recommended → How shifting from Bizible to HockeyStack changed Planful's marketing team

Challenges of Implementing Multi-Touch Attribution

While multi-touch attribution offers incredible insights, implementing it isn't without its challenges. From data integration hurdles to accurately tracking offline interactions, there are obstacles you need to be prepared for.

Data Integration and Silos

One of the biggest hurdles in implementing multi-touch attribution is dealing with fragmented data across different platforms and departments. 

Marketing data often lives in separate systems – CRM, analytics platforms, advertising platforms, and email marketing tools – creating data silos that make it difficult to track the complete customer journey. 

The challenge deepens when these systems use different formats, tracking parameters, and customer identifiers. Without proper integration, you might miss crucial touchpoints or have an incomplete view of how customers interact with your brand across channels. 

💡Solution → Create a unified data structure. 

This starts with implementing standardized naming conventions and consistent tracking parameters across all platforms. 

Alternatively, invest in a marketing attribution software that can help bridge these gaps by acting as a central hub for all your marketing data. 

Cross-Device Tracking

Tracking users across multiple devices is quite complex because of the number of interactions involved. 

For example, customers might start their journey on a mobile phone, continue research on a laptop, and make a final purchase on a tablet. This fragmented journey creates significant challenges for accurate attribution. 

The complexity increases with privacy regulations and the phasing out of third-party cookies [*]. These changes make it harder to maintain consistent user identification across different devices and browsing sessions. 

🎯Note: Google has currently paused its promise to block third-party cookies till further notice [*]. 

💡Solution → Implement a first-party data strategy. 

This involves using methods like user authentication, unified customer IDs, and probabilistic matching techniques. 

By encouraging users to log in across devices and leveraging first-party cookies, you can create a more complete view of the customer journey.

Limited Offline Metrics

One of the most significant blind spots in multi-touch attribution is accurately tracking offline interactions. 

While digital touchpoints are relatively easy to monitor, offline interactions like in-store visits, or phone calls often go untracked or are inadequately measured in the attribution model. This gap in offline tracking can lead to undervaluing important marketing channels. 

💡Solution → Set up a comprehensive offline tracking strategy. 

This can include using unique QR codes in print materials, dedicated phone numbers for different campaigns, and loyalty program integration for in-store purchases. 

Marketing mix modeling (MMM) can also be integrated with your attribution platform to connect offline purchases with online customer journeys. 

Limited Visibility of External Factors

Multi-touch attribution models for B2B often struggle to account for external factors that influence customer decisions. 

Market conditions, seasonal trends, competitor activities, and broader economic factors can significantly impact purchasing behavior, yet these variables are rarely captured in standard attribution models. 

For example, a customer might see your ads multiple times but make a purchase primarily because a competitor’s product was out of stock, or because of a seasonal need. 

Traditional attribution models would attribute the conversion to your marketing touchpoints, potentially overvaluing their impact while missing the true driving force behind the purchase decision. 

💡Solution → Complement their attribution data with broader market analysis. 

This means tracking competitor activities, monitoring industry trends, and considering seasonal patterns when analyzing attribution results. 

Advanced attribution platforms like HockeyStack now incorporate external data feeds and market intelligence to provide more context around conversion patterns. 

Regular monitoring of these external factors also helps create an in-depth understanding of what truly drives conversions. 

Attribution Window

Setting the right attribution window – the time frame in which touchpoints are considered part of the conversion journey – poses a significant challenge in multi-touch attribution. 

If the window is too short, you might miss important early interactions; too long, and you could include irrelevant touchpoints that didn’t meaningfully influence the purchase decision. 

This challenge is particularly complex for businesses with varying sales cycles. 

For instance, a B2B software purchase might take months, while an e-commerce transaction could happen within hours. The same attribution window wouldn’t work effectively for both scenarios. 

Additionally, different products or services within the same company might require different attribution windows, making it difficult to establish a one-size-fits-all approach. 

💡Solution → Analyze your typical customer journey length and set appropriate windows based on your business type and product complexity. 

Many organizations are now implementing dynamic attribution windows that adjust based on product category, customer segment, or sales cycle length. 

HockeyStack Attribution Lookback feature enables you to look into activities that lead to your goal (for example, Enterprise Closed/Won Deals) in the Last 90, Last 180, or even Last 365 Days.

‍

Stop Guessing, Start Tracking — with HockeyStack

Let’s lay out the facts — most attribution tools either oversimplify your customer journey or overwhelm you with unnecessary complexity. 

You either get partial data that doesn’t tell the whole story, or you’re drowning in metrics that don’t actually help you make decisions.

What if you can change that? 

See, here’s the thing with HockeyStack — instead of forcing you to piece together data from multiple tools or settle for basic last-click attribution, you get the full picture of your customer journey in one place. 

Don’t just take it from us, listen to Chris Wood, Director of Demand Generation, ActiveCampaign. 

Now, back to why HockeyStack should be your go-to attribution solution:

• Real-Time, All-in-One Insights. Track every customer interaction as it happens – from LinkedIn ads to blog posts to email campaigns – all in a single, intuitive dashboard.
• Zero Technical Headaches. No coding required, no data team needed. Just plug it in and get insights from day one.
• Marketing ROI, Crystal Clear. Finally understand which channels actually drive revenue. No more guessing if your LinkedIn ads are worth it or which blog posts bring valuable leads. 
• Seamless Integration. Works with your existing tech stack right out of the box. No need to overhaul your current setup.
• Actionable Data, Not Just Numbers. Get insights in plain English that tell you exactly where to invest your marketing dollars.

Every time a potential customer interacts with your brand – whether it’s through an ad, blog post, or email campaign – HockeyStack is tracking, analyzing, and connecting the dots. 

Tired of last-click attribution? We get it 😏 Switch to HockeyStack.

‍